Showing posts with label Civil disobedience. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Civil disobedience. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Report From Occupy Riverside Police Raid


http://la.indymedia.org/news/2011/11/249529.php

by Rockero Monday, Nov. 07, 2011 at 4:02 PM 

RIVERSIDE (CA) - Sunday, November 6, 2011 - Approximately 25 police in riot gear raided the peaceful encampment of Occupy Riverside yesterday afternoon. They dismantled and confiscated tents to the jeers of the demonstrators.
The booth set up for the People's Kitchen and the media table were consolidated in the center of the plaza, and, in attempt to defend these stations and personal belongings, occupiers linked arms and formed a human chain around them. Police chose a point of the circle where several young women were linked together, apparently having identified it as the "weak link" of the chain.

There they began to pull the chain apart. Many people were slammed to the ground, had their faced smashed into the concrete, and had the knees of officers applied to their necks and heads. One woman, the primary volunteer behind the people's kitchen, was brutalized particularly aggressively. Her arm was severely twisted, leading many witnesses to think that her shoulder had been dislocated. (We later discovered that the injury was not that severe.) Another young woman who is currently battling cancer received a nightstick to the eye and blows to the kidneys. She subsequently reported blood in her urine stream. The other main volunteer behind the People's Kitchen, a grandmother 55 years of age, reported being "manhandled."

In total, 11 comrades were arrested. Nine were charged with PC 148, "resisting or delaying a public officer." Two were charged with assault with a deadly weapon for allegedly throwing a can at officers. Most people at the encampment did not witness anything thrown or any acts of violence on the part of occupiers. There were one or two, however, who claimed that one of the young homeless women who had recently joined the encampment did throw something, but well after the police violence began. (In reports in the corporate media, police claim that their use of excessive force was provoked by the thrown can.)

Arrestees were taken to the police station and subsequently transferred to the Robert Presley Detention Center a few blocks from the occupation. Impromptu rallies were held to denounce the brutality, the confiscation of the tents, and to demand the release of our comrades. At about midnight, the first of our compañeras was released. Slowly, throughout the night, the remaining arrestees were released one-by-one.

Shortly after the police left the camp in ruins, occupiers returned and rebuilt, determined not to allow themselves to be intimidated. A meeting, scheduled earlier in the week with police Chief Sergio Díaz for tonight (Monday night) is now up in the air as protesters are set to reevaluate that decision at tonight's 7:00 pm general assembly. As one participant remarked last night, "We are well beyond the point of dialogue at this point. In raiding us before our scheduled meeting to discuss our mutual concerns, the police have again demonstrated that they have been negotiating in bad faith." A well-known Riverside political insider made another point clear: "The way politics work in this city, the police would not have done this without the approval--without orders from--the mayor."

Occupiers are currently discussing the possibilities of holding a press conference to correct the record and make demands concerning the incident and of holding a march to denounce the violent repression, and once consensus is reached on these proposals, calls will be put out for all Inland residents, all occupiers, and all people of conscience to join us.

Dispatch from Occupy DC "Occupy the Kochs" Action

http://la.indymedia.org/news/2011/11/249399.php


by Rockero Friday, Nov. 04, 2011 at 11:12 PM 
rockero420@yahoo.com
Friday, November , 2011
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Occupy DC, in support of Common Cause and other organizations, supported a "guerrilla drive-in" at the Washington DC convention center. We followed that with a militant action of our own, detaining Koch supporters for approximately to hours.
Dispatch from Occupy...
Occupy DC has been holding its encampment for over a month now, and has been particularly hospitable to visiting occupiers, including this correspondant.

They do things a little differently here in the nation's capital, but no so differently that they are unrecognizable or foreign. The spirit of resistance is the same.

Today, Occupy DC took part in an action against the billionaire Koch brothers, who, in addition to being part of the 1%, have been particularly vociferous about advancing the ultraconservative agenda. Today, that agenda included a banquet--a tribute to Ronald Reagan--called "Defending the American Dream." It featured such darlings of the American right (and one-percenters) as Rudy Giuliani, Herman Cain, and Mitt Romney. Obviously, Occupy DC had to intervene.

We began with a march from McPherson square, one of two sites currently occupied in the district, and proceeded to the convention center, where a new documentary film about the nefarious siblings was projected onto the convention center's wall.

We then retreated to give distance between the Common Cause action and our own, before returning to occupy one of the center's main intersections. Our idea was to detain the class war criminals at the luxurious banquet.

Soon, however, we realized that there were enough of us to occupy several more locations! We expanded to two, then three, then six neighboring intersections.

We chanted, sang songs, and otherwise entertained ourselves as we held our positions.

But at about 9:30, the 1% became restless and began exiting. Becoming frustrated with our blockade, some of the more militant among them came out to taunt, intimidate, and attempt to provoke us.

We were much wiser than they, however, and refused to succumb to such sophomoric gestures. So their militancy increased. One of the attendees, the driver of a silver Lexus, deliberately knocked down one of our comrades. I was deeply engaged in reading a radical book on loan from the Occupy DC library and so did not see the collision. Nonetheless, I heard a loud thud, a collective gasp, and looked up in time to see the automobile race away at a breakneck pace. I turned to see the compañera, immobilized on the pavement. We called ambulances to aid her, and several occupiers chased down the vehicle and detained it. Approximately three individuals were arrested for this heroic act of self-sacrifice.

Shortly thereafter, the vast majority of the one percent having left under police protection, we returned to our camp, but not before passing by the White House, which we justly declared "Our House."

We ate dinner and commiserated, eager to regroup for further action in the days to come.

Occupy Riverside Solidarity Actions with November 2 General Strike

http://la.indymedia.org/news/2011/11/249322.php


by Rockero Wednesday, Nov. 02, 2011 at 9:27 PM 

rockero420@yahoo.com
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
RIVERSIDE (CA) - In a day of actions in solidarity with the Oakland general strike, called in response to vicious police violence, Occupy Riverside stepped action up.
The morning began with acts of civil disobedience. The cat-and-mouse game between police and occupiers and police is now at a new stage. For the past week or so, we campers have set up tents at night, only to be roused in the morning by police who required us to dismantle them. Up until today, we begrudgingly accepted, but the sense of satisfaction from simply putting up tents--which we were technically barred from doing--had evaporated.

This morning, that changed when three of our comrades remained in their tents even after the second wake-up-and-dismatle call. Despite the disobedience, police backed down. No arrests were mde; not a single citation was issued.

Marches occurred and drew numerous participants. When marchers reached the Bank of America, they were greeted with signs announcing the bank's closure for the day. There were some attempts to serve B of A customers but simultaneously deny access to those customers who were occupying Riverside. Eventually, one person was able to enter the bank and shut down his account. He was then accompanied to the local community credit union, where he opened an account.

The banks are obviously running scared. They have rescinded their threat to fine us but have no idea that we are nowhere near satisfied. November 5, national divestment day, promises to be tumultuous. If they shut down for a small march in Riverside, California, because one person wanted to close his account, what will they do when multitudes nationwide seek to do the same this Saturday?

For clarification...

by Justin N Wednesday, Nov. 02, 2011 at 11:40 PM 
I don't think the article above makes one particular point clearly enough.

We had a small march- roughly a dozen people.

B of A wasn't simply closed for the day- they put up an obviously pre-prepared closure sign IMMEDIATELY AFTER we arrived. They also told customers that they were closed due to OUR PRESENCE.

A dozen non-violent protesters, doing nothing more than chanting and holding signs on a public sidewalk, shut down the bank.

We didn't plan on closing anyone's accounts, or even being there longer than it took to announce Divestment Day. Of course, if B of A is going to shut themselves down for us... we weren't going to pass that up.