Followup Meeting Between Colton Community and Police
by Rockero Sunday, Mar. 13, 2011 at 11:35 AMrockero420@yahoo.com
Saturday, March 12, 2011
COLTON, California - In a follow-up meeting to a community forum held in December, Chief Bob Miller and Detective Eric Campa of the Colton Police Department again met with residents to share the department's new directive concerning vehicle impounds.
After an opening serenade of traditional Son Jarocho music, the officials, along with representatives from Latinos Unidos de Colton and an official from the Justice Department's Office of Community Relations, took their seats on the dais at Alice Birney Elementary School.
Following the requisite formalities of introductions and a summary of the December meeting, Detective Campa, a thick-jowled family man and the department's new community liaison, read aloud the new policy directive, purportedly influenced by the community's recommendations. The document was in very legalistic language, but its content was fortunately made accessible by an adept interpreter, who both interpreted the statement and paraphrased it in such a way as to make it accessible to the community.
The gist was that, while the vehicle code allows for impounding vehicles of unlicensed drivers for 30 days, the community caretaking doctrine says that law enforcement agencies should only do so if vehicles are obstructing traffic, are illegally parked, or are at risk of vandalism or theft. The new policy directive is that if a vehicle, once stopped, is parked in a person's driveway or carport or is in a safe parking lot, the car should generally not be impounded, although the officer will still have the discretion to do so if he or she believes that there is some danger or risk of danger to either the vehicle or the community.
The other part of the directive indicates to officers that if a licensed driver is present within the vehicle to safely move it, it should likewise not be impounded.
Other announcements, though not part of the new directive, included a statement by the chief that he had listened to conflict-of-interest concerns about the city's operation of an impound yard for towed vehicles and was seeking ways to do away with said yard.
He also said that, while hesitant to create a "grace period" policy to allow time for a licensed driver to retrieve an otherwise-impoundable vehicle, he was willing to allow for such a period when the watch commander deemed it feasible.
Time was subsequently allotted for questions about the new policy. The first question came from Veronica, a Latinos Unidos member. She wanted to know if the chief had spoken with the motorcycle officers about their conduct, because in her view, Officer Gomez and another officer known by the bandanna he wears, continue to harass community members. The chief explained that he had spoken with the officers, and that since the motorcycle officers were assigned to traffic detail, their job was specifically to stop motorists.
The second question came from Yolanda, who also complained about Officer Gomez. She was parked at a liquor store, she testified, and was detained by Gomez allegedly because her headlights were not functioning. When she turned on the vehicle to demonstrate that the lights did indeed function, the officer impounded the vehicle. The woman's fifteen-year old daughter asked when she would be eligible for a license, and the officer replied, "Never, 'cause you're illegal just like your mom." A minor dispute between the minor and the officer ensued during which the girl stood up against the abuse and defended her rights as a citizen. The officer not only impounded the vehicle, but also confiscated Yolanda's only identification and her insurance papers, and being without an ID has caused her several problems. "How can I get my ID back?" she asked.
Chief Miller asked her to see him and Det. Campa after the meeting. He then asked her a question, "What would you do if you were the chief of police and you heard a testimony like the one you just shared?"
"What would I do?" The woman paused. "First, I would put myself in the position of the officer, and I would only stop people who were breaking the law or causing some danger. I don't have a license, it's true, but I have to drive because there's no alternative. I realize I'm taking a risk, and that's why I'm extra careful not to break any traffic laws, and there's no way your officers can know I don't have a license just by how I'm driving."
She continued, "But if I were chief, I suppose what I would do is join the community in its efforts to ensure that all California residents have access to a driver's licesnse regardless of their immigration status." Cheers and a raucous burst of applause followed.
One of the meeting's organizers then shared that, through the Justice for Immigrants Coalition, community organizations were working to lobby for precisely that sort of legislation in Sacramento.
The next question came from a man who said that he had been similarly profiled, and shared an incident in which he had sought to avoid a checkpoint in the neighboring city of San Bernardino and was unlawfully detained. In that instance, the officer refused to inform him as to why he was stopped. "Why do the police do this?" he asked.
Chief Miller said that he understood the concern about checkpoints and that his department had not conducted one in three years. He also disavowed any claim to jurisdiction over San Bernardino. His recommended procedure was to ask a detaining officer why a stop was being made, and if the information was not granted, to ask for the officer's name and badge number, and if that information was not revealed, then to ask for a supervisor.
"As to why we do what we do, that's a conversation that could take two hours. For a lot of cops it's a vocation, a calling."
Marquez Equalibria, the official from the Justice Department, echoed the chief. "Chief Miller said that this conversation could go on for hours, and he's right. What's important here is that you, as a community, have opened up a dialogue with your police department, and there's no reason for that dialogue to end."
The gist was that, while the vehicle code allows for impounding vehicles of unlicensed drivers for 30 days, the community caretaking doctrine says that law enforcement agencies should only do so if vehicles are obstructing traffic, are illegally parked, or are at risk of vandalism or theft. The new policy directive is that if a vehicle, once stopped, is parked in a person's driveway or carport or is in a safe parking lot, the car should generally not be impounded, although the officer will still have the discretion to do so if he or she believes that there is some danger or risk of danger to either the vehicle or the community.
The other part of the directive indicates to officers that if a licensed driver is present within the vehicle to safely move it, it should likewise not be impounded.
Other announcements, though not part of the new directive, included a statement by the chief that he had listened to conflict-of-interest concerns about the city's operation of an impound yard for towed vehicles and was seeking ways to do away with said yard.
He also said that, while hesitant to create a "grace period" policy to allow time for a licensed driver to retrieve an otherwise-impoundable vehicle, he was willing to allow for such a period when the watch commander deemed it feasible.
Time was subsequently allotted for questions about the new policy. The first question came from Veronica, a Latinos Unidos member. She wanted to know if the chief had spoken with the motorcycle officers about their conduct, because in her view, Officer Gomez and another officer known by the bandanna he wears, continue to harass community members. The chief explained that he had spoken with the officers, and that since the motorcycle officers were assigned to traffic detail, their job was specifically to stop motorists.
The second question came from Yolanda, who also complained about Officer Gomez. She was parked at a liquor store, she testified, and was detained by Gomez allegedly because her headlights were not functioning. When she turned on the vehicle to demonstrate that the lights did indeed function, the officer impounded the vehicle. The woman's fifteen-year old daughter asked when she would be eligible for a license, and the officer replied, "Never, 'cause you're illegal just like your mom." A minor dispute between the minor and the officer ensued during which the girl stood up against the abuse and defended her rights as a citizen. The officer not only impounded the vehicle, but also confiscated Yolanda's only identification and her insurance papers, and being without an ID has caused her several problems. "How can I get my ID back?" she asked.
Chief Miller asked her to see him and Det. Campa after the meeting. He then asked her a question, "What would you do if you were the chief of police and you heard a testimony like the one you just shared?"
"What would I do?" The woman paused. "First, I would put myself in the position of the officer, and I would only stop people who were breaking the law or causing some danger. I don't have a license, it's true, but I have to drive because there's no alternative. I realize I'm taking a risk, and that's why I'm extra careful not to break any traffic laws, and there's no way your officers can know I don't have a license just by how I'm driving."
She continued, "But if I were chief, I suppose what I would do is join the community in its efforts to ensure that all California residents have access to a driver's licesnse regardless of their immigration status." Cheers and a raucous burst of applause followed.
One of the meeting's organizers then shared that, through the Justice for Immigrants Coalition, community organizations were working to lobby for precisely that sort of legislation in Sacramento.
The next question came from a man who said that he had been similarly profiled, and shared an incident in which he had sought to avoid a checkpoint in the neighboring city of San Bernardino and was unlawfully detained. In that instance, the officer refused to inform him as to why he was stopped. "Why do the police do this?" he asked.
Chief Miller said that he understood the concern about checkpoints and that his department had not conducted one in three years. He also disavowed any claim to jurisdiction over San Bernardino. His recommended procedure was to ask a detaining officer why a stop was being made, and if the information was not granted, to ask for the officer's name and badge number, and if that information was not revealed, then to ask for a supervisor.
"As to why we do what we do, that's a conversation that could take two hours. For a lot of cops it's a vocation, a calling."
Marquez Equalibria, the official from the Justice Department, echoed the chief. "Chief Miller said that this conversation could go on for hours, and he's right. What's important here is that you, as a community, have opened up a dialogue with your police department, and there's no reason for that dialogue to end."
002
Son jarocho
003
Comunidad
004 
Many present
006
Summary
007
What is the Office of Community Relations?
008
The abuses continue...
009
Why do cops do what they do?
010
We need to change the laws!
No comments:
Post a Comment